Paxton Challenges Biden's Border Policy in Federal Court
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has filed a federal lawsuit against the Biden Administration, challenging the executive decision to stop building the wall along the U.S.-Mexico border. The suit argues that halting construction violates federal law, worsens the border situation, and poses significant security threats to Texas and the nation.
National Security Cited as Primary Concern

Attorney General Paxton stressed the critical role of border barriers in national security. "The Biden Administration’s decision to halt construction of the border wall is not only irresponsible but also illegal," Paxton asserted. "Their open border policies invite danger, overwhelming our communities and jeopardizing the safety of Texans and all Americans. We must have effective tools to control our border."
Alleged Violations of Federal Law

The lawsuit contends the administration's actions contravene laws like the Secure Fence Act of 2006, which mandates border barrier construction. Paxton argues that pausing construction and potentially redirecting appropriated funds constitutes an unlawful executive overreach, ignoring the will of Congress.
Strain on Texas Resources Highlighted

The suit emphasizes the substantial economic and social costs borne by Texas due to increased migration flows, which Paxton links to the administration's border policies. The state claims it faces mounting expenses for law enforcement, healthcare, education, and social services directly resulting from the situation at the border.
Lawsuit Demands Resumption of Construction
Paxton seeks an immediate court injunction ordering the Biden Administration to resume border wall construction using the allocated funds. The lawsuit aims to compel adherence to federal law and reinstate measures Paxton considers vital for border control.
Potential Impact of the Legal Battle
This legal challenge could significantly shape U.S. border security policy. A ruling favouring Texas might compel the administration to restart wall construction, while a ruling against Texas could reinforce the administration's current approach. The case is poised to attract significant national attention and fuel the ongoing debate over immigration enforcement.