Breaking Latest update on developing story. Click for details.

Georgia Election Law Update: SB 202 and Changes to Ballot Drop Box Access

Reviewing Georgia's Senate Bill 202, commonly known as the Election Integrity Act of 2021, focusing on its modifications to ballot drop box usage, absentee voting, and the stated goal of enhancing election security.

Georgia Enacts SB 202, Reshaping Election Procedures

Georgia Enacts SB 202, Reshaping Election Procedures

Atlanta, GA – Georgia implemented significant changes to its election laws with the passage of Senate Bill 202, often referred to as the Election Integrity Act of 2021. Signed into law by Governor Brian Kemp, the legislation altered various voting procedures, with notable impacts on ballot drop box availability and absentee voting rules, sparking national debate on election security versus accessibility.

SB 202 introduced stricter regulations for ballot drop boxes, including location restrictions and limited access hours, aiming to standardize their use across counties.

Key Changes Introduced by SB 202

The law brought several critical modifications. Regarding ballot drop boxes, it mandates they be placed *inside* designated early voting locations and accessible *only* during the site's operating hours. This ended the 24/7 availability previously seen in some areas. Furthermore, the number of drop boxes per county is now capped, generally limited to one per early voting site or one per 100,000 active registered voters, whichever is fewer.

  • Drop boxes restricted to indoor early voting locations.
  • Access limited to official early voting hours.
  • Number of drop boxes capped based on county's active registered voters.
  • Requires new voter ID requirements for absentee ballot requests.
  • Shortens the window for requesting absentee ballots.

Governor Kemp's Stated Rationale

Governor Kemp's Stated Rationale

Governor Kemp and supporters framed SB 202 as essential for restoring public confidence in Georgia's elections. "This bill strengthens voting integrity to ensure that every legal vote counts," Kemp often stated, emphasizing enhanced security measures. Proponents argued the changes, like requiring drop boxes to be under surveillance inside government buildings, were necessary to prevent potential tampering and ensure chain of custody.

Criticism and Voter Access Concerns

Criticism and Voter Access Concerns

Critics, including voting rights groups and Democratic lawmakers, condemned the law, arguing its provisions create unnecessary barriers to voting that could disproportionately harm minority communities, urban residents, and voters with disabilities or limited transportation. They contended that reducing drop box availability and shortening voting timelines could suppress turnout, particularly comparing the new rules to the expanded access options utilized during the 2020 elections. Concerns were also raised about the added logistical challenges for election administrators.

Ongoing Impact and Legal Challenges

Since its enactment, SB 202 has faced numerous legal challenges questioning its constitutionality and impact on voter rights. Its effects on voter participation and election administration continue to be closely monitored and debated in subsequent Georgia elections. The law remains a focal point in the national conversation about balancing election security with voter accessibility.

Further Information

For detailed information on Georgia's election laws, including SB 202, consider these official resources:

  • Georgia Secretary of State's Office Website
  • Official Text of Senate Bill 202 (via Georgia General Assembly website)
  • County Election Board Information